It is important to note that leadership and management are similar yet different in nature. According to Horwitz & Klontz (2013) management is defined as a process that helps organizations to meet their goals through working with individuals and the resources within the organization. It has three major characteristics that include: a series of continuous as well as related activities, it is concentrated on meeting the goals of an organization and meets the goals by being able to work with people and the resources in the organization (Taylor et al 2015). On the other hand, leadership is considered as the ability of a person to inspire or to have an influence on others to meet organizational goals. This means that leaders have followers.
In a research by Horwitz and Klontz (2013) they evaluated the distinction between the leaders and the managers. The findings showed that how they both motivate individuals is a major distinction between the two, the way they think or act. Managers have been considered to place more emphasis on control, how to solve issues, goals and targets. In so doing, they are able to combine the various conflicting ideas so that people accept to them but then, the leaders are quite different to this. Leaders offer a new approach and create new issues for discussion. They develop visions, influence culture in the organizations and then inspire others. Ibra and Hansen (2011) asserts that leaders can be viewed to have administrative work and the managers find it essential to lead others so that some work is done.
Based on the CMI, there is no effective style of leadership or management but the approach to leadership and management is shaped by the environment or circumstance in which an organization is. Note that there are different types of subordinates and this implies that it is not possible for one leadership or management style to work. It follows that the most effective way to leadership is chosen in order to manage the subordinates. Over the past, Blake and Mouton management grid has been critical in examining the needs of managers in completing a given job as well as concern on the subordinates have an impact on the style of management. According to Blake and Moulton, style of management can be: team management, middle of the road management, country club as a form of leadership, authority and impoverished (Taylor et al 2015). Out of this, team management is viewed as being more effective. This is a more common style of management as in the workforce one expects to have a particular style of leadership and management.
I accept that command and control is not viewed as the most effective style of management by organizations today. Recent investigations, show that millennials that are 50 % within the workforce look for five major things among their senior and include: flexibility with the work schedule, coaching, honesty, inspirational and help in formal development.
Although it is possible to note that some the major things discussed above can the in “team development”, it is likely that the others cannot be. Taking assumptions that present workforce has millennial subordinates which falls into Kellerman’s five kinds of leadership means that we are concerned on what they need. Situational leadership place focus on managing individuals based on the kind of situation that one finds them in and this is in line to the CMI view suggested in 2013.
According to CMI (2013) no single form of leadership can fit in all situations. Hence, availability of the situational form of leadership implies that various situations call for change of the style to suit the given setting that relates to competency and also development in the subordinates which would be a good approach.
For instance, Tom Cook of Apple uses democratic form of leadership because he has been able to adopt the previous practices on entrepreneurship in the company to come up with a unique blend where he majorly focuses on the existing products and foster the business as well as relationships with employees. However, this kind of management style may not be adequate to all the various kinds of organizations faced with issues on accountability. This is in contrast to the former CEO Steve Jobs who was visionary, charismatic and always thoughtful by the employees of Apple. This form of leadership was control in the decision making and less input from the members of the organization.
In general, I would like to be led using situational style of management since my behavior would change depending on the circumstance I find myself in; hence the situational style would be more effective. I also want to be guided along in my career and work best in teams which is best managed by situational leadership.
References
CMI 2013, Understanding Management Styles Checklist 236, Chartered Management Institute: London
Ibarra, H, & Hansen, M 2011, ‘Are You a Collaborative Leader?’ Harvard Business Review [online], 89, 7/8, pp. 68-74
Horwitz, E., Klontz, B. 2013, ‘Understanding and Dealing with Client Resistance to change’, Journal of Financial Planning, 26 (11), pp. 27-31.
Taylor, T, Doherty, A, & McGraw, P 2015, Managing People in Sport Organizations: A Strategic Human Resource Management Perspective, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, Discovery eBooks, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 September 2016.